Diversity in Advertising: Who You Reach Is a Growth Decision

Diversity in advertising is the practice of representing a broad range of people, identities, and lived experiences in the audiences you target, the creative you produce, and the media channels you buy. Done well, it is not a compliance exercise. It is a commercial decision that determines how much of the available market you can actually reach.

Most brands treat diversity as a creative brief problem. The smarter ones treat it as a growth strategy problem, because that is what it is.

I spent a good portion of my earlier career overvaluing lower-funnel performance. The numbers looked clean, the attribution looked tight, and the conversion rates gave everyone in the room something to feel good about. What I missed, and what I think a lot of performance-first organisations still miss, is that most of what performance marketing gets credited for was going to happen anyway. You are capturing intent that already existed. The harder and more valuable work is creating it in the first place, which means reaching people who have never seriously considered your brand. That is a reach and representation problem before it is a targeting problem.

Why Diversity in Advertising Is a Market Size Argument

There is a version of the diversity conversation that lives entirely in the creative department, focused on casting, imagery, and representation in executions. That conversation matters. But it is downstream of a more fundamental commercial question: which audiences are you actually trying to grow with?

Think about it the way you would think about any other market expansion decision. If a significant portion of the population does not see themselves in your advertising, does not feel addressed by your messaging, and does not encounter your brand in the media environments they actually use, then you have not penetrated that segment. You have simply chosen not to compete for it. That choice has a revenue consequence, and most organisations have never modelled what that consequence actually costs them.

The BCG research on go-to-market strategy and brand coalitions makes a related point about how brands build durable market positions. Reach breadth matters, not just reach efficiency. The brands that compound audience share over time are the ones that systematically expand who they are relevant to, not just how efficiently they convert the people already in their funnel.

If you are thinking about how your overall go-to-market approach connects to audience strategy, the articles in the Go-To-Market and Growth Strategy hub cover the commercial mechanics in more depth.

The Authenticity Problem Is Actually a Process Problem

I remember sitting in a brainstorm early in my career, working on a Guinness brief. The founder had to leave mid-session and handed me the whiteboard pen on his way out. I was not prepared for that moment, but I had to make something of it. What I learned in that room, and in a lot of rooms since, is that the quality of what comes out of a creative process is almost entirely determined by who is in the room and what constraints they are working within. Diversity of perspective in the room is not a nice-to-have. It is a quality control mechanism.

The same logic applies to advertising that tries to represent communities the team has no lived experience of. When diverse representation is treated as a late-stage production decision, it shows. Audiences who belong to those communities notice it immediately, and the backlash, when it comes, is rarely about the execution. It is about the absence of genuine understanding behind it.

Authenticity in advertising is not a creative skill. It is an organisational capability. It requires diverse teams, genuine community insight, and enough time in the brief for real understanding to develop. Brands that bolt diversity onto the back end of a campaign process will consistently produce work that feels performative, because it is.

This is also why a surface-level audit of your advertising output will not tell you much. The more useful diagnostic is an audit of your inputs: your audience strategy, your media planning assumptions, and the makeup of the teams doing the work. A thorough analysis of your company’s website and marketing signals will often surface the audience gaps faster than any creative review will.

Media Planning Is Where Diversity Decisions Actually Get Made

Most of the diversity conversation in advertising focuses on creative. The media plan gets far less scrutiny, which is a mistake, because media planning is where the reach decisions live.

If your media mix is built around channels that skew heavily toward a particular demographic, no amount of inclusive creative will compensate for the fact that you are simply not present where other audiences spend their time. You are optimising the message while ignoring the distribution problem.

This is where endemic advertising becomes a genuinely useful tool. Placing advertising within media environments that specific communities already trust and engage with is categorically different from using demographic targeting overlays on broad platforms. The context itself signals relevance. A brand appearing in a publication or platform that a community has chosen, rather than one that an algorithm has decided they might visit, starts from a different place of credibility.

The market penetration research from Semrush reinforces something I have seen play out across dozens of client engagements: brands that grow consistently are not just converting better within their existing audience. They are systematically expanding the pool of people who consider them relevant. That expansion is a media strategy question as much as it is a creative one.

Performance Marketing Has a Diversity Blind Spot

Algorithmic optimisation is very good at finding the people most likely to convert right now. It is structurally poor at reaching people who have never engaged with your brand before. When you let performance systems run unchecked, they will almost always narrow toward the audiences already in your funnel, because those are the audiences with the highest short-term conversion probability.

The result, over time, is an advertising programme that becomes progressively less diverse in who it reaches, not because anyone made that decision explicitly, but because the optimisation logic made it implicitly. The algorithm is doing exactly what you told it to do. The problem is what you told it to do.

I think about this in terms of a clothing shop analogy. Someone who tries something on is many times more likely to buy it than someone who walks past the window. But to get someone into the fitting room, you first have to get them through the door. Performance marketing is very good at serving the people already in the fitting room. It is not designed to bring in people who have never considered walking through your door at all. That is an awareness and reach problem, and it requires different tools, different channels, and a different measurement framework.

The Vidyard analysis on why go-to-market feels harder touches on this: the audiences that are easy to reach are already saturated with messages from you and your competitors. The growth is in the audiences that are harder to reach, which means they require more deliberate effort and less algorithmic autopilot.

For B2B organisations, this challenge shows up in a specific way. If your demand generation is built primarily around intent signals and retargeting, you are competing for the same narrow slice of in-market buyers as every other vendor in your category. The brands that build pipeline advantage are the ones that expand who considers them before the buying window opens. The pay-per-appointment model in lead generation is one example of how some B2B organisations are trying to break out of pure intent-capture mode, though it comes with its own trade-offs.

Sector-Specific Considerations: B2B and Financial Services

Diversity in advertising is often framed as a consumer brand concern. That framing is wrong, and it causes B2B organisations to opt out of a conversation that is directly relevant to their growth.

The buying population in most B2B categories is becoming more diverse at every level of seniority. The decision-makers your sales team will be pitching to in five years are not the same demographic profile as the ones they pitched to five years ago. If your brand has spent that time building awareness and credibility exclusively within a narrow demographic, you will enter those conversations at a disadvantage that no amount of sales enablement will fully compensate for.

In financial services specifically, this is a live commercial issue. B2B financial services marketing has historically operated within very narrow audience assumptions, and those assumptions are increasingly misaligned with who actually controls financial decisions in organisations. The brands that are building diverse audience strategies in financial services now are building a structural advantage that will compound over the next decade.

The Forrester intelligent growth model framework is worth revisiting in this context. Intelligent growth is not just about optimising what already works. It is about systematically expanding the conditions under which growth is possible, and audience diversity is one of those conditions.

What Due Diligence on Diversity Actually Looks Like

I have done a lot of marketing due diligence work, reviewing the marketing operations of businesses being acquired or restructured. One of the consistent gaps I find is that organisations have very little visibility into the demographic composition of the audiences they are actually reaching, as opposed to the audiences they intend to reach.

Audience strategy documents say one thing. The media plan, the creative, the channel mix, and the algorithmic optimisation settings tell a different story. The gap between stated intention and actual practice is almost always larger than the organisation believes.

A proper digital marketing due diligence process should surface this gap explicitly. That means auditing not just performance metrics, but the audience composition data behind them: who is actually seeing the advertising, what channels are generating that reach, and how that compares to the addressable market the business is trying to grow in.

The BCG work on go-to-market strategy in B2B markets makes a point that applies here: the long tail of underserved segments often represents the most significant untapped value in a market. Brands that have historically concentrated on the easiest-to-reach audiences have frequently left the most interesting growth opportunities unexamined.

Building a Diverse Audience Strategy Into the Planning Process

The practical question is not whether diversity in advertising matters. It does, commercially and ethically. The question is how to build it into planning in a way that produces durable results rather than one-off campaigns that generate press coverage and then disappear.

A few things I have seen work consistently across different organisations and categories:

Start with the audience strategy, not the creative brief. Define which segments represent genuine growth opportunity, model the revenue implications of reaching them, and build the media and creative strategy from there. Diversity that emerges from a commercial audience strategy is structurally more durable than diversity that emerges from a creative brief.

Audit your media mix for structural exclusions. Some channels are genuinely better at reaching certain communities than others. If your media plan is built entirely around channels that skew toward audiences you already reach well, you have a distribution problem that creative cannot solve. Endemic placements, community-specific publishers, and culturally relevant platforms are worth serious evaluation, not as add-ons to the main plan, but as core components of it.

Separate diversity reach metrics from performance metrics. If you measure new audience reach with the same conversion-rate benchmarks you apply to retargeting, you will always deprioritise it. New audiences need longer nurture cycles, different creative, and different success metrics. Build that into the planning assumptions before the campaign launches, not after it underperforms against the wrong benchmarks.

For B2B technology companies managing multiple business units, the challenge of coordinating a consistent audience strategy across different product lines and markets is particularly acute. The corporate and business unit marketing framework for B2B tech companies addresses how to structure that coordination without losing the specificity that makes audience strategy effective at the product level.

The Vidyard Future Revenue Report found that GTM teams consistently underestimate the pipeline potential sitting in audiences they are not currently reaching. That is not a creative problem. It is a strategic one.

The Compounding Effect of Getting This Right Early

Brand equity with any audience is not built in a single campaign. It is built through consistent presence, relevant messaging, and genuine understanding demonstrated over time. Brands that start building diverse audience strategies now are compounding advantages that will be structurally difficult for slower competitors to close.

The brands that waited until diversity became a cultural flashpoint to start thinking about representation found themselves in an impossible position: trying to build credibility with communities they had visibly ignored for years, under conditions of heightened scrutiny, with timelines driven by PR cycles rather than genuine strategy. That is a bad position to be in, and it was entirely avoidable.

The organisations I have seen handle this well share a common characteristic. They treated diverse audience reach as a growth investment with a long time horizon, not a reputation management exercise with a short one. That orientation changes every downstream decision, from how you brief creative, to how you plan media, to how you measure success.

If you are working through the broader commercial architecture of your growth strategy, the full range of go-to-market and growth strategy resources at The Marketing Juice covers audience strategy, channel planning, and market expansion in more depth.

About the Author

Keith Lacy is a marketing strategist and former agency CEO with 20+ years of experience across agency leadership, performance marketing, and commercial strategy. He writes The Marketing Juice to cut through the noise and share what works.

Frequently Asked Questions