Go-to-Market Strategy for B2B Products: Build It Around Buyers, Not Your Product

A go-to-market strategy for B2B products is the plan that defines how you take a product to a specific market, reach the right buyers, and convert interest into revenue. It covers positioning, channel selection, sales motion, and the metrics that tell you whether any of it is working. Most B2B companies have one. Fewer have one that is actually grounded in how their buyers make decisions.

The gap between a GTM plan that looks good in a deck and one that generates pipeline is almost always the same thing: the plan was built around the product, not the buyer. This article is about closing that gap.

If you want broader context on how go-to-market thinking fits into commercial growth planning, the Go-To-Market & Growth Strategy hub covers the full landscape, from market entry to scaling.

What Does a B2B Go-to-Market Strategy Actually Need to Do?

Strip away the frameworks and the slide templates and a GTM strategy has one job: get the right product in front of the right buyers, in a way that makes them want to act. That sounds obvious. In practice, most GTM plans are a list of channels and a timeline, with the assumption that a good product will do the rest.

I spent years running agencies and watching clients launch B2B products with significant budgets and modest results. The pattern was almost always the same. The product team had built something genuinely useful. The marketing team had produced materials that described what it did. But nobody had done the harder work of understanding how buyers actually think about the problem the product solves, what language they use, what alternatives they are already considering, and what would make them move.

A functioning GTM strategy needs to answer six questions before it touches a channel or a budget:

• Who is the buyer, and who else is involved in the decision?
• What problem are they trying to solve, in their language, not yours?
• Why would they choose you over doing nothing, or choosing an alternative?
• Where do they go when they are actively or passively looking for solutions?
• What does the sales motion look like, and who owns which part of it?
• How will you know if it is working, and at what point do you adjust?

If any of those six questions are vague or unanswered, the GTM plan will underperform regardless of execution quality.

Positioning Is the Foundation, Not the Decoration

B2B marketers often treat positioning as something that gets sorted in the brand guidelines and then forgotten. In practice, positioning is the single biggest lever in a GTM strategy. It determines whether your product makes sense to a buyer in the first ten seconds of encountering it, or whether they move on.

April Dunford’s work on positioning is worth reading if you have not already. Her core argument, that positioning is not a tagline but a deliberate act of placing your product in a competitive context that makes its value obvious, is exactly right. Most B2B products are positioned against the wrong alternatives, or against no alternative at all.

I once worked with a SaaS business that positioned itself as an “AI-powered analytics platform.” Their actual buyers were operations directors who were drowning in spreadsheets and needed to stop making decisions based on data that was two weeks old. When we repositioned the product around that specific problem, with that specific buyer in mind, conversion rates from trial to paid improved materially within a quarter. The product had not changed. The positioning had.

Good positioning in B2B also needs to account for the buying committee. In most B2B decisions, the person who feels the pain is not the person who signs the contract. Your GTM strategy needs messaging that works for both: the practitioner who wants relief, and the economic buyer who wants ROI and reduced risk. These are not the same message.

Your Website Has a Commercial Job to Do

Before you spend a pound or a dollar driving traffic, your website needs to be able to do its job. In B2B, that job is not to impress. It is to qualify, inform, and convert. Most B2B websites fail at all three.

I have run a version of a structured website audit before almost every GTM engagement I have been involved in. The same problems appear repeatedly: value propositions buried below the fold, navigation structured around the company’s internal org chart rather than the buyer’s questions, calls to action that ask for too much too soon, and social proof that is either absent or unconvincing. If you want a systematic way to approach this, a checklist for analysing your company website for sales and marketing strategy is a useful starting point before you commit budget to any inbound channel.

The website audit matters because in B2B, the buyer’s experience is largely self-directed. Forrester’s research has consistently shown that B2B buyers complete a significant portion of their evaluation before they speak to a salesperson. If your website cannot carry that early-stage conversation, your sales team will spend their time educating prospects who should have been qualified or disqualified long before they picked up the phone.

Channel Strategy: Follow the Buyer, Not the Convention

One of the most common GTM mistakes I see in B2B is channel selection driven by internal comfort rather than buyer behaviour. Companies default to the channels their team knows, or the channels that are easiest to measure, rather than the channels where their buyers actually spend time and form opinions.

Performance marketing is the clearest example of this. Paid search is a legitimate channel for B2B products where buyers are actively searching for solutions. But if your product is new, or solves a problem buyers do not yet have a name for, there is no search volume to capture. You are not going to find a buyer who does not yet know they have the problem you solve by bidding on keywords. In those cases, performance marketing captures existing demand rather than creating new demand, and the companies that understand market penetration dynamics will know the difference.

Earlier in my career I overvalued lower-funnel performance channels. I thought if the numbers looked good on the dashboard, the strategy was working. It took a few years of running larger accounts and watching what happened when we cut brand spend to understand that a lot of what performance marketing gets credited for was going to happen anyway. The buyer had already decided. We just captured them at the point of intent. That is not a bad thing, but it is not a growth strategy on its own.

For B2B products with a longer sales cycle or a less defined category, the channels that matter most are often the ones that are hardest to measure: thought leadership, industry events, analyst relations, specialist media, and content that reaches buyers when they are in a learning mindset rather than a buying mindset. Endemic advertising, placing messages in the specific industry publications and environments where your buyers already spend time, is often underused in B2B GTM because it is harder to attribute than search. That does not make it less effective.

For companies considering a commercial transformation of their go-to-market model, BCG’s work on GTM strategy is worth reading. Their argument that commercial transformation requires aligning sales, marketing, and operations around the buyer rather than around internal functions mirrors what I have seen work in practice.

Sales Motion: Who Does What, and When

A GTM strategy that stops at marketing is incomplete. In B2B, the sales motion is part of the strategy, and the handoff between marketing and sales is where most GTM plans break down in execution.

The question of how leads are generated, qualified, and converted needs to be answered explicitly. Are you running a product-led model where the product itself does the selling? An inbound model where content and SEO generate demand that sales then converts? An outbound model where sales development reps are creating pipeline from cold? Or a hybrid? Each of these has different cost structures, different timelines to revenue, and different requirements from the marketing function.

For B2B companies with a high average contract value and a complex sale, the question of how to generate qualified appointments efficiently is worth examining carefully. Pay-per-appointment lead generation models have become more sophisticated and can be a useful mechanism for testing whether a market exists before committing to a full inbound build. They are not a permanent strategy, but as a way of generating early signal, they have their place.

The sales and marketing alignment question also comes up differently depending on company structure. In larger B2B organisations, the tension between corporate marketing and business unit marketing creates its own GTM complexity. A corporate and business unit marketing framework for B2B tech companies can help clarify where decisions should be made centrally and where business units need the freedom to go to market on their own terms.

Sector-Specific GTM Considerations

B2B is not a monolithic category. The GTM approach for a logistics software company is materially different from the GTM approach for a compliance platform selling into financial services. Sector matters, and ignoring it produces generic strategies that feel right in theory and underperform in practice.

Regulated sectors are a good example. In financial services, the buying process involves compliance, legal, procurement, and often the board. The sales cycle is longer, the content requirements are more rigorous, and the trust signals that move a buyer forward are different from those in an unregulated sector. B2B financial services marketing requires a level of credibility-building that most generic GTM frameworks do not account for. If you are selling into a regulated sector, your GTM plan needs to be built around that reality, not retrofitted to it.

I have worked across more than 30 industries over the course of my career. The single biggest mistake I see companies make when entering a new sector is assuming that what worked elsewhere will transfer cleanly. It rarely does. The buying process, the language, the trust signals, and the competitive dynamics are different in almost every sector. A GTM strategy that does not account for those differences is a generic strategy, and generic strategies produce average results.

Due Diligence Before You Commit

One of the underused disciplines in B2B GTM planning is proper due diligence on the marketing infrastructure and market position before you start spending. This matters particularly in two situations: when a company is entering a new market, and when a business is being acquired or invested in and the buyer needs to understand what they are actually buying.

I have been involved in a number of situations where companies launched GTM programmes without understanding their own digital baseline. They did not know what organic search equity they had, how their current website was performing against commercial intent queries, or where competitors were outranking them on the terms that mattered. Digital marketing due diligence is not glamorous, but it prevents companies from building on a foundation they have not properly assessed.

The same principle applies to market analysis. Before committing to a GTM strategy, you need to understand the actual size of the addressable market, where demand is concentrated, and whether the channels you are planning to use are already saturated by better-resourced competitors. BCG’s work on brand strategy and commercial transformation makes the point that market entry decisions need to be grounded in honest market assessment, not optimistic assumptions.

Measurement: Honest Approximation Over False Precision

B2B GTM measurement is genuinely hard. The sales cycle is long, attribution is messy, and the buyer’s experience involves touchpoints that are invisible to your analytics stack. A prospect reads a piece of content, attends a webinar six weeks later, sees a LinkedIn ad, gets a cold email, and then calls the number on your website. Which of those gets the credit?

The honest answer is that last-touch attribution in B2B is largely fiction. It tells you which channel was present at the moment of conversion, not which channel created the conditions for conversion. I have judged the Effie Awards, and the campaigns that demonstrate genuine business effectiveness are almost never the ones that optimised for last-click metrics. They are the ones that understood the full commercial picture and made decisions accordingly.

That does not mean measurement is impossible. It means you need a measurement framework that is honest about what it can and cannot tell you. Pipeline velocity, cost per qualified opportunity, win rate by segment, and revenue by channel are all meaningful. Click-through rates and impressions are not meaningless, but they are not business outcomes. Build your GTM measurement around the metrics that connect to commercial results, and be sceptical of dashboards that look impressive but do not tell you whether the business is growing.

Tools like those covered in growth hacking tool roundups can be useful for identifying early signals, particularly around content performance and competitive positioning. But tools are a perspective on reality, not reality itself. The insight is in the interpretation, not the data.

Video has also become a more significant part of the B2B GTM toolkit. Vidyard’s research on pipeline and revenue potential for GTM teams points to the growing role of video in accelerating B2B sales cycles, particularly in the mid-funnel where buyers are evaluating alternatives and need more than a PDF to make progress.

The Product Is Not the Strategy

There is a version of GTM thinking, common in product-led growth circles, that suggests a great product will market itself if you just remove the friction. There is some truth in this for certain categories. But in most B2B contexts, the product being genuinely good is a necessary condition, not a sufficient one.

I have seen genuinely excellent B2B products fail commercially because the GTM strategy was weak. And I have seen mediocre products outperform better ones because the company understood its buyer, its positioning, and its sales motion better than the competition. The market does not automatically reward the best product. It rewards the product that is best understood by the buyer at the moment they are making a decision.

That said, there is a version of this that cuts the other way. Marketing is sometimes used as a blunt instrument to prop up products with more fundamental problems. If your customers are churning at high rates, if NPS is poor, if the product is not delivering on its promise, no amount of GTM sophistication will fix that. The companies that grow consistently are the ones that genuinely delight customers at every opportunity, not just at the point of sale. GTM strategy built on top of a product that does not deliver is expensive noise.

If you want to go deeper on how GTM strategy connects to broader commercial growth planning, the Go-To-Market & Growth Strategy hub brings together the frameworks and thinking that inform how modern B2B companies build sustainable pipelines.

About the Author

Keith Lacy is a marketing strategist and former agency CEO with 20+ years of experience across agency leadership, performance marketing, and commercial strategy. He writes The Marketing Juice to cut through the noise and share what works.

Frequently Asked Questions