Legacy Brand Refresh: How to Choose the Right Consultant

The best consultants for refreshing legacy enterprise brands are not always the biggest names in the room. The firms that consistently deliver are the ones that combine deep strategic capability with the commercial discipline to understand what a brand refresh actually needs to achieve for the business, not just for the portfolio deck.

Legacy brands carry weight that startups would envy, but that weight can also anchor them. The right consultant knows how to work with what exists, strip away what no longer earns its place, and build something that performs without erasing the equity that took decades to accumulate.

Why Legacy Enterprise Brands Need a Different Kind of Consultant

There is a meaningful difference between building a brand from scratch and refreshing one that has been in market for thirty years. The brief looks similar on the surface. The work is entirely different underneath.

When I was running an agency and working with large enterprise clients, one of the most consistent mistakes I saw was brands hiring consultants who were excellent at brand building but had no real feel for brand stewardship. They would come in, run a discovery process, and then recommend changes that were strategically coherent but commercially naive. They had not properly accounted for what the brand already owned in the minds of customers, distributors, or internal teams who had been living with it for decades.

Legacy brands are not blank canvases. They have accumulated associations, some intentional and some not. They have customer relationships that predate any current marketing leadership. They have internal cultures that have grown around the brand’s identity. A consultant who treats the refresh as a clean-sheet exercise is going to create problems that will take years to resolve.

The firms and individuals worth hiring understand this instinctively. They start with an honest audit of what the brand currently owns, what it has earned, and what is genuinely holding it back. Only then do they make recommendations about what to change.

If you want to understand the broader strategic context for this kind of work, the brand positioning and strategy hub covers the full landscape, from positioning frameworks to architecture decisions, in considerably more depth.

What Separates Good Brand Refresh Consultants from the Rest

Before getting into specific firms and profiles, it is worth being clear about what the evaluation criteria should actually be. Most procurement processes for consultants of this type focus on credentials, case studies, and chemistry. Those things matter, but they are not sufficient.

The questions that separate good from great are more uncomfortable. How do they handle internal disagreement between the CMO and the CEO about what the brand should stand for? What do they do when the research contradicts the founder’s instincts? How do they manage the tension between what is strategically correct and what is politically achievable within a large organisation?

I have judged the Effie Awards, and one thing that experience clarified for me is that effectiveness and creativity are not the same thing. Some of the most celebrated brand work I reviewed had almost no measurable commercial impact. Some of the least glamorous work moved the needle significantly. The consultants who understand that distinction are the ones worth hiring for a legacy refresh.

The other factor that matters enormously is how they approach brand awareness measurement. A consultant who cannot tell you how they will know whether the refresh worked is not a consultant you want managing a multi-million pound brand asset.

The Major Consultancies: What They Do Well and Where They Fall Short

The large management consultancies, McKinsey, BCG, Bain and their equivalents, have invested heavily in brand and marketing capability over the past decade. BCG in particular has published useful thinking on how brand strategy intersects with HR and go-to-market decisions, which reflects a more integrated view of what brand work actually involves at enterprise scale.

The strength of these firms is their ability to operate at board level, connect brand decisions to financial performance, and manage complex stakeholder environments. If your brand refresh is fundamentally a business transformation challenge with a brand dimension, they are worth serious consideration.

The weakness is that the brand work itself can feel thin. The strategic frameworks are sound, but the creative and executional capability is often not native to these firms. They will bring in partners or sub-contractors for the craft elements, and the quality of that work varies considerably. You are also paying for a brand that carries the weight of their own positioning, which is not always a neutral factor in how they approach your brief.

The dedicated brand consultancies, Interbrand, Landor, Wolff Olins, FutureBrand and their peers, have the opposite profile. Their craft is excellent. Their creative and strategic brand capability is deep and well-tested. Where they can struggle is in connecting brand recommendations to commercial outcomes in language that resonates with a CFO or a board that is sceptical about brand investment.

I have seen this play out in practice. A brand consultancy produces a genuinely excellent piece of strategic and creative work. It is coherent, well-researched, and defensible. Then it hits the board, and the questions are all about ROI, payback period, and competitive differentiation in commercial rather than brand terms. The consultancy does not have good answers, because they were not brought in to think about those questions. The work stalls or gets diluted.

The best outcomes I have seen from legacy brand refreshes come when you have a consultant who can genuinely operate in both registers. That is a rarer profile than the market would have you believe.

Mid-Size Specialists Worth Knowing

The most interesting work in legacy brand refresh is often happening outside the obvious names. There is a tier of mid-size brand strategy firms that have built genuine expertise in specific sectors or specific types of brand challenge. They are not trying to sell you a proprietary methodology. They are trying to solve your problem.

Prophet is a firm that sits between the management consultancy and the brand consultancy in a way that works well for enterprise clients. They have genuine brand strategy depth combined with a commercial orientation that makes them credible in board-level conversations. Their work on brand-led growth, connecting brand decisions to revenue outcomes, is more rigorous than most.

Siegel+Gale has built a strong reputation around simplicity as a brand principle, which sounds like a soft idea until you see how much operational complexity large organisations create through inconsistent brand expression. Their approach to brand architecture and brand experience has commercial logic embedded in it, not just aesthetic preference.

eatbigfish, founded by Adam Morgan, has done some of the most rigorous thinking about challenger brand dynamics. For legacy brands that need to rediscover some competitive edge without abandoning their heritage, the challenger brand lens is genuinely useful, even if the brand is not technically a challenger in market share terms.

There are also a growing number of independent brand strategists with enterprise-level experience who operate outside any firm structure. The quality varies enormously, but the best of them offer something the larger firms cannot: undivided attention, no upselling, and no internal politics affecting the advice you receive. If you can find someone with genuine enterprise credentials operating independently, they are worth a serious conversation.

The Risk of Getting This Wrong

Choosing the wrong consultant for a legacy brand refresh is not just an expensive mistake. It can set a brand back by years. Equity that took decades to build can be eroded surprisingly quickly by a refresh that sends confused signals to the market.

There is a useful perspective on this from Moz, which has written about the risks to brand equity from poorly managed brand decisions. The underlying point applies well beyond the specific context: brand equity is fragile in ways that are not always visible until the damage is done.

The other risk is internal. A brand refresh that does not carry the organisation with it will fail regardless of how good the external work is. I have seen this happen more than once. A new brand platform is launched, the marketing team is excited, and then six months later the sales team is still using the old materials, the customer service team has never heard of the new positioning, and the brand is effectively running two identities in parallel. BCG’s research on brand strategy consistently points to internal alignment as one of the strongest predictors of brand performance at scale.

The right consultant will have a clear process for managing internal rollout, not just external launch. If they cannot tell you how they will bring the organisation with them, that is a significant gap in their capability.

How to Run the Selection Process Properly

Most enterprise procurement processes for brand consultants are not designed to find the best firm. They are designed to manage risk and create a defensible paper trail. Those are different objectives, and the process reflects it.

If you want to find the right consultant rather than the safest choice, the process needs to be different. Start by being honest about what the actual problem is. Not “we need a brand refresh” but the underlying business challenge that the refresh is meant to address. Is the brand losing relevance with a younger audience? Is it carrying negative associations from a period of underperformance? Is it failing to support a premium pricing strategy? The specificity of the brief will tell you a lot about which consultants are actually equipped to help.

When I was growing the agency I ran from around 20 people to close to 100, one of the things I learned about winning pitches was that the clients who gave the most honest briefs got the best work. The ones who held back the difficult context, the internal politics, the failed previous attempts, got proposals that addressed a sanitised version of their problem. The consultants were not at fault. They were responding to what they had been given.

In the selection process, ask each consultant to tell you about a brand refresh that did not go as planned and what they learned from it. The answer will tell you more about their capability than any case study they choose to present. Firms that cannot give you a candid answer to that question are not firms you want managing a sensitive brand asset.

Also pay attention to who is actually in the room. The senior people who present the pitch are often not the people who will do the work. Ask explicitly who will be leading the day-to-day engagement and meet them before you make a decision.

What a Good Brief Looks Like

The quality of the consultant you attract is partly a function of the quality of the brief you write. A vague brief attracts generic responses. A specific, commercially grounded brief attracts consultants who can think clearly about your actual problem.

A good brief for a legacy brand refresh includes the commercial context, the specific brand challenges you have identified, the constraints you are working within (budget, timeline, internal politics, existing brand assets that cannot change), and a clear definition of what success looks like in measurable terms.

It also includes the things that have already been tried and did not work. This is the section most briefs omit, and it is often the most useful information a consultant can receive. If you have already run a brand tracking study that showed declining relevance with a specific demographic, share it. If a previous refresh attempt stalled internally, explain why. The consultant who can engage honestly with that context is the one who understands what the job actually involves.

There is a broader point here about why existing brand building strategies stop working for mature businesses. Often the issue is not that the strategy was wrong when it was written. It is that the market moved and the brand did not move with it. A good brief acknowledges this honestly rather than framing the refresh as a response to an internal decision rather than an external reality.

Visual coherence is another dimension that gets underweighted in briefs. Building a brand identity toolkit that is genuinely flexible and durable is harder than it sounds for a legacy brand with decades of accumulated assets across multiple markets. The brief should be explicit about the scope of visual work involved and the constraints that apply.

The Implementation Question Nobody Asks Early Enough

Most conversations about brand refresh consultants focus on the strategy and creative phase. The implementation question gets asked late, if at all. This is where a significant proportion of brand refresh projects lose their value.

A brand refresh for a large enterprise involves changing assets across dozens of touchpoints, often across multiple markets, multiple languages, and multiple internal teams with different levels of enthusiasm for the change. The consultant who helps you think through that implementation challenge from the start is worth considerably more than one who hands over a beautiful brand guidelines document and considers the job done.

Ask every consultant you evaluate what their involvement looks like after the strategy is signed off. Ask how they have managed implementation in previous enterprise engagements. Ask what typically goes wrong and how they handle it. The answers will reveal a great deal about whether they understand the full scope of what you are asking them to help with.

Brand loyalty, particularly in markets where consumer confidence has been under pressure, is harder to rebuild than most organisations expect. Brand loyalty is not a fixed asset, and the implementation of a refresh is one of the highest-risk moments in a brand’s relationship with its existing customers. Getting the sequencing and communication right matters as much as getting the strategy right.

If you are working through the broader strategic decisions that sit behind a brand refresh, the brand strategy and positioning resources on The Marketing Juice cover the frameworks and approaches that make these decisions more rigorous and less reliant on instinct alone.

About the Author

Keith Lacy is a marketing strategist and former agency CEO with 20+ years of experience across agency leadership, performance marketing, and commercial strategy. He writes The Marketing Juice to cut through the noise and share what works.

Frequently Asked Questions