Old Spice Advertising: What Marketers Get Wrong About It

The Old Spice “The Man Your Man Could Smell Like” campaign is one of the most studied advertising examples of the last two decades. It reversed a declining brand, made Old Spice culturally relevant to a generation that had written it off, and became a case study in how creative risk can drive commercial results. But most of the analysis misses what actually made it work.

The campaign succeeded not because of the viral mechanics or the social media follow-through, both of which get most of the attention, but because someone made a clear strategic choice about who the brand needed to talk to and what it needed to say. The execution was brilliant. The strategy underneath it was more important.

What Was the Old Spice Campaign Actually Trying to Do?

Before you can assess whether Old Spice advertising worked, you need to understand what problem it was solving. By the late 2000s, Old Spice was a brand in structural decline. It was associated with an older generation, carried by habit and nostalgia rather than preference, and losing ground to brands like Axe (Lynx in the UK) that had successfully colonised the younger male demographic with a completely different kind of advertising.

The brief that Wieden+Kennedy received was not “make a funny ad.” It was closer to: how do we make this brand relevant to men who currently wouldn’t consider it? The creative team’s answer was to reframe the target audience entirely. Rather than trying to convince young men to buy Old Spice for themselves, the campaign spoke directly to women, specifically women who buy grooming products for the men in their lives.

That is a positioning decision, not a creative decision. And it changed everything downstream: the tone, the casting, the media placement, the social strategy. Isaiah Mustafa’s character was not performing for men. He was performing for women who were watching men. The joke only works if you understand who is actually in the room.

If you are thinking about the broader mechanics of audience strategy and how it connects to growth, the Go-To-Market and Growth Strategy hub covers this in more depth, including how audience selection shapes channel decisions and commercial outcomes.

Why Most Brands Copy the Wrong Part of Old Spice

I have sat in enough agency new business pitches and client strategy sessions to know what happens when a brand wants to “do an Old Spice.” They mean they want something funny, irreverent, slightly absurdist, with a charismatic spokesperson and a social media activation that generates shares. They are describing the surface of the campaign, not the structure of it.

The surface is copyable. The structure is not, because the structure requires you to make a hard choice about who you are actually for and what you are willing to give up to serve that audience properly. Old Spice chose to stop trying to be everything to everyone and made a specific bet on a specific audience insight. That kind of clarity is uncomfortable. Most brands avoid it.

What gets copied instead is the tone: the self-aware humour, the fast cuts, the knowing wink at the audience. And occasionally that produces something decent. More often it produces advertising that feels like it is trying to be funny without having anything to say. The humour in the Old Spice campaign worked because it was in service of a clear message. Remove the message and you just have noise.

I spent a period earlier in my career at an agency where we were regularly asked to produce work that felt “significant” without any clarity on what the brand was disrupting or why. The briefs would arrive with adjectives where the strategy should have been. “Bold. Unexpected. Shareable.” Those words describe a desired reaction, not a positioning. Old Spice succeeded because Wieden+Kennedy started with the positioning and let the reaction follow from it.

The Audience Insight That Actually Drove the Campaign

The audience insight at the centre of the Old Spice campaign is one worth spending time on, because it is more sophisticated than it looks.

The observation was that a significant proportion of men’s body wash is purchased by women. Not gifted, not occasionally picked up, but regularly bought as part of routine household shopping. That means the purchase decision for a product positioned as masculine is frequently made by someone who is not the end user. If you are trying to grow a men’s grooming brand and you ignore that dynamic, you are optimising for the wrong person.

What the campaign did was acknowledge that dynamic openly and turn it into the creative premise. “The Man Your Man Could Smell Like” is a line that speaks to women while making men want to be the man being described. It flatters both audiences simultaneously without being dishonest to either. That is genuinely difficult to pull off, and it required a level of audience understanding that goes well beyond demographic data.

This is the kind of insight that comes from understanding behaviour, not just attitudes. People do not always buy what they say they buy or for the reasons they claim. The gap between stated preference and actual behaviour is where the most useful strategic thinking lives. Most brand tracking and customer surveys operate at the surface. The Old Spice team went deeper.

There is a useful parallel in how BCG has written about understanding the evolving needs of different customer populations in go-to-market strategy. The principle is the same: the customer who buys is not always the customer who uses, and conflating the two leads to misaligned positioning.

What the Social Media Activation Actually Did

The social media component of the Old Spice campaign, where Isaiah Mustafa responded to individual Twitter users and celebrities in personalised video responses, is often cited as the moment the campaign became a phenomenon. It is also the part most frequently misunderstood.

The personalised responses worked because they extended an already-established creative platform, not because personalisation is inherently powerful. Mustafa responding to a tweet from a random user was funny because the audience already understood the character. Without the original TV spot establishing the tone and the persona, the response videos would have been confusing rather than delightful.

This sequencing matters. The campaign built mass awareness first through television, then amplified that awareness through social. The social activation was not a substitute for broadcast reach. It was a multiplier on top of it. Brands that try to run the social activation without the broadcast foundation are skipping a step and wondering why nothing catches.

I have seen this pattern repeatedly. A client sees a social-first campaign generate enormous organic reach and concludes that social is the channel. What they miss is that the campaign generating that reach was almost always preceded by significant above-the-line investment that seeded the cultural awareness the social content then fed off. Growth hacking examples that look like they came from nowhere usually have a less visible foundation underneath them. Semrush’s breakdown of growth hacking examples illustrates how the most successful cases combine multiple mechanisms rather than relying on a single channel or tactic.

The Commercial Results and What They Tell Us

Old Spice body wash sales increased substantially in the months following the campaign launch. The brand went from losing market share to gaining it. That commercial outcome is what makes this a legitimate case study rather than just an award-winning piece of creative work.

But the mechanism behind that growth is worth examining. The campaign did not primarily convert existing Old Spice users into heavier buyers. It brought in new users, specifically people who had previously considered Old Spice irrelevant or invisible. That is a different kind of growth, and it requires a different kind of marketing.

Earlier in my career I was heavily focused on lower-funnel performance. Conversion rates, cost per acquisition, return on ad spend. There is nothing wrong with that discipline, but I came to understand that a meaningful proportion of what performance marketing gets credited for was going to happen regardless. Someone who was already planning to buy will often find their way to a purchase without much help. The harder and more valuable work is reaching people who were not yet considering you at all.

Old Spice did not optimise its way to growth. It expanded its addressable audience by changing who the brand was visible and relevant to. That is a fundamentally different commercial lever, and it is one that most performance-focused marketing budgets are structurally unable to pull. Understanding how to build growth loops that expand reach, rather than just capture existing intent, is something Hotjar’s work on growth loops addresses in a useful way.

Creative Bravery Is Not the Same as Creative Recklessness

One of the things that gets lost in the retelling of the Old Spice story is how much strategic rigour went into enabling the creative risk. The campaign felt bold. It was also carefully constructed.

The casting of Isaiah Mustafa was not accidental. The decision to shoot in a single continuous take was not a stylistic whim. The choice to launch during the Super Bowl pre-game rather than the game itself was a media strategy decision that shaped how the campaign was received. Every element of the execution was in service of the positioning, and the positioning had been stress-tested before the creative went anywhere near production.

I remember a pitch early in my time at Cybercom where the founder handed me the whiteboard pen mid-brainstorm and walked out to take a client call. The room was full of people waiting to see what I would do. The temptation in that moment is to perform confidence, to put something bold on the board because boldness looks like leadership. What I learned over time is that the most useful thing you can put on a whiteboard is a clear question, not a flashy answer. The Old Spice team asked the right question first: who is actually making this purchase decision? Everything else followed from that.

Creative bravery without a clear strategic question underneath it produces work that wins awards and moves nothing commercially. The Effie Awards, which I have had the opportunity to judge, exist specifically to recognise work where creative ambition and commercial effectiveness are aligned. The Old Spice campaign won an Effie because the numbers moved, not just because the ads were entertaining.

What Brand Strategy Actually Has to Do With This

Old Spice is sometimes held up as a rebranding success story, and in a loose sense that is accurate. But the word “rebranding” implies a change in what the brand is. What actually happened was more precise than that.

The brand’s core attributes, masculinity, confidence, a certain kind of self-assurance, were not abandoned. They were reinterpreted for a different cultural moment and presented through a different creative lens. The heritage of the brand was not erased. It was acknowledged and then subverted in a way that made it feel current rather than dated.

That distinction matters because brands that genuinely rebrand, changing their values and positioning wholesale, often lose the equity they were trying to revive. Old Spice kept what was worth keeping and changed how it was expressed. That requires a clear-eyed understanding of what the brand actually stands for, separate from the executional layer that has accumulated over decades.

BCG has written about the relationship between brand strategy and go-to-market alignment, and the principle that brand and commercial strategy need to be built together rather than sequentially is directly relevant here. Old Spice’s success was not a marketing department acting independently. It was a commercial decision to reposition the brand in a specific competitive context, with marketing as the execution vehicle.

The Lesson Most Marketers Should Take From Old Spice

If I had to distil what Old Spice advertising actually teaches, it is this: clarity about who you are talking to, and why they should care, is more valuable than any creative technique or channel innovation.

The campaign is remembered for its humour, its pace, its cultural presence. Those things are real. But they were outputs of a decision made much earlier in the process, a decision about audience, about purchase behaviour, and about what the brand needed to represent to become relevant again. Most brands that try to replicate Old Spice start at the execution layer and never get to the strategic layer underneath it.

The practical implication is uncomfortable for most marketing teams: before you brief your agency or your in-house creative team, you need to be genuinely clear on who is making the purchase decision and what they need to believe to make it. Not who you wish was buying, not who your product was designed for, but who is actually standing at the shelf or the checkout screen with their card in hand.

Old Spice found that the person with the card in hand was often not who the brand had been talking to. When they adjusted for that reality, everything else became possible. Tools that help marketers understand actual user behaviour, rather than assumed behaviour, are worth investing in. Crazy Egg’s thinking on growth strategy touches on the importance of behavioural data in shaping decisions that go beyond surface-level optimisation.

The growth strategy work that produces durable results tends to share this quality: it starts with an honest account of current reality, including who is buying, why, and what is getting in the way of more people doing the same. Old Spice did that work. Most brands do not.

For more on how audience strategy, positioning, and channel decisions connect to commercial growth, the Go-To-Market and Growth Strategy hub brings together the frameworks and thinking that sit behind cases like this one.

About the Author

Keith Lacy is a marketing strategist and former agency CEO with 20+ years of experience across agency leadership, performance marketing, and commercial strategy. He writes The Marketing Juice to cut through the noise and share what works.

Frequently Asked Questions