Marketing Strategy Starts Broad. Here’s Why That Order Matters

The marketing strategy process starts broad before narrowing because you cannot make good decisions about where to focus until you understand the full landscape you are operating in. Starting narrow means you optimise for the wrong things, miss the biggest opportunities, and build a plan around assumptions that were never tested.

It is a discipline problem as much as a process problem. Most teams want to jump to tactics because tactics feel productive. But a strategy built on an incomplete picture of the market is just a well-organised guess.

Why the Sequence of Strategy Matters More Than Most Teams Realise

When I was running an agency and we were pitching for new business, one of the clearest signals that a prospective client had a strategic problem was when they came to us with the solution already formed. They wanted a social media campaign, or a rebrand, or a paid search overhaul. They had already decided. What they wanted from us was execution, not thinking.

Sometimes that was fine. But more often, the solution they had settled on was the product of skipping the broad phase entirely. They had gone from “we have a growth problem” to “we need more social content” without passing through the uncomfortable middle stage where you actually examine the market, the competitive set, the customer, and the business model with any rigour.

The broad-to-narrow sequence exists to prevent that. It is not a methodological preference. It is a safeguard against the very human tendency to reach for familiar answers before the question is properly understood.

If you are building or pressure-testing a go-to-market approach, the wider context for this sits in the Go-To-Market and Growth Strategy hub, which covers the full arc of how strategy gets built and deployed commercially.

What “Starting Broad” Actually Means in Practice

Broad does not mean vague. This is where the process gets misunderstood. Teams hear “start with the big picture” and interpret it as permission to spend weeks in discovery without producing anything useful. That is not what it means.

Starting broad means deliberately expanding your field of view before you begin making choices. It means asking: who is the full universe of potential customers, not just the ones we already serve? What is the full competitive landscape, not just the two or three competitors we always benchmark against? What are the macro forces affecting this category? What does the customer actually want, as opposed to what we assume they want?

These are not philosophical questions. They are commercial ones. And the answers change the strategy materially.

I spent a significant part of my career working across performance marketing channels, and one of the things I came to understand, probably later than I should have, is that most performance marketing does not create demand. It captures it. The people clicking your paid search ads were already in market. You did not put them there. If your entire strategy is built around capturing existing intent, you are not growing. You are harvesting. And at some point, the harvest runs out.

Starting broad forces you to confront that. It forces you to ask where future demand is going to come from, not just where current demand is sitting. That is a fundamentally different question, and it requires a wider lens to answer honestly.

The Problem With Starting Narrow

Starting narrow feels efficient. You already know your core customer. You already know which channels work. You already have a view on the competitive set. Why spend time on things you think you already understand?

The answer is that what you think you know is often the product of your existing position in the market, not an objective view of it. Your data tells you about the people who already found you. Your channel performance tells you about the intent that already existed. Your competitive analysis tells you about the rivals you were already watching.

None of that tells you about the customers who chose someone else, the channels you have not tested, or the competitors who are not on your radar yet but are growing fast in an adjacent segment. Starting narrow means you are building strategy on a partial dataset and calling it a complete picture.

I have seen this play out in real businesses. When I was involved in turning around a loss-making agency, one of the first things I noticed was that the team had a very precise understanding of a very small part of the market. They knew their existing client base deeply. What they did not have was any structured view of the broader opportunity. They had narrowed before they had ever been broad, and the result was a business that was optimised for a segment that was not big enough to sustain it.

The fix was not better execution. It was stepping back and doing the broad analysis that should have happened earlier. Who else could this agency serve? What capabilities translated to adjacent sectors? What was the competitive dynamic in those spaces? Only once those questions were answered could we make sensible choices about where to focus.

How the Broad Phase Informs Better Narrowing

The point of starting broad is not to stay broad. The point is that when you eventually narrow, you do it with evidence rather than instinct. The choices you make about which segments to prioritise, which channels to invest in, which messages to lead with, all of those become more defensible when they emerge from a structured analysis of the full landscape rather than a gut feeling about what you already know.

This is where critical thinking becomes the most important skill in the process. Not the ability to analyse data, though that matters. The ability to question the assumptions embedded in your analysis. To ask whether the market segmentation you are using reflects how customers actually make decisions, or just how your organisation has historically categorised them. To ask whether the channels you are prioritising are genuinely the best fit for the audience you want to reach, or just the ones you have always used.

If I were bringing a junior marketer into a strategy process for the first time, the one thing I would want them to develop in the first thirty days is the habit of questioning the frame, not just the content. Most strategic errors are not errors of analysis. They are errors of framing. The team analysed the right data but asked the wrong question. The broad phase is your best opportunity to get the question right before you commit to answering it.

Frameworks like Forrester’s intelligent growth model make a similar point: sustainable growth requires a structured view of where opportunity exists across the full market, not just within the segments a business already occupies. The broad phase is how you build that view.

Where Most Strategy Processes Actually Break Down

The broad-to-narrow sequence sounds logical when you describe it. In practice, it breaks down in a few consistent places.

The first is time pressure. Strategy processes get compressed because there is a deadline, a board presentation, a campaign launch date. The broad phase gets shortened or skipped entirely because it is the part that does not produce an output that looks like progress. No one can see a wider market view taking shape. They can see a media plan. So the media plan gets built before the market view is complete.

The second is organisational bias. The people in the room during strategy sessions tend to be the people closest to the existing business. They have deep knowledge of what has worked before, which is genuinely useful, but it also creates a gravitational pull toward familiar answers. The broad phase is supposed to introduce perspectives that challenge that familiarity. When those perspectives are absent, or when they are introduced but not given enough weight, the strategy ends up looking like a refined version of last year’s plan rather than a genuinely considered response to the current market.

The third is a misunderstanding of what data is actually telling you. I have sat in rooms where teams have presented very detailed analytics as evidence of strategic insight. Conversion rates, cost per acquisition, channel attribution. All of it accurate. None of it sufficient. That data tells you about the behaviour of people who are already in your funnel. It tells you almost nothing about the much larger population who are not. BCG’s research on go-to-market strategy has consistently highlighted that businesses underestimate the size of the addressable market they are not yet reaching, precisely because their internal data only reflects the customers they have already acquired.

Starting broad is the corrective for all three of these failure modes. It creates space for challenge. It forces the inclusion of external perspectives. And it requires you to look beyond your existing data to understand the full market you are operating in.

The Role of Audience Expansion in the Broad Phase

One of the most commercially important things the broad phase does is force a genuine conversation about audience. Not the audience you have. The audience you could have.

There is a mental model I find useful here. Think about a clothes shop. Someone who tries something on is far more likely to buy than someone who walks past the window. The act of engagement, of actually experiencing the product, changes the probability of purchase significantly. But if you only ever market to people who are already inside the shop, you are ignoring the much larger population outside it.

Most performance-led strategies are built around people who are already inside the shop. They are already searching, already comparing, already close to a decision. Capturing that intent is valuable. But it is not growth in any meaningful sense. Growth requires reaching people who are not yet considering you. That is a different challenge, and it requires a different approach to audience definition.

The broad phase is where you map that full audience landscape. Who are the people who could benefit from what you offer but are not yet aware of you? What are their adjacent interests and behaviours? Where do they spend time? What would need to be true for them to consider you? These questions cannot be answered from your existing customer data. They require you to look further out.

For brands thinking about creator-led go-to-market approaches as one mechanism for reaching new audiences, Later’s work on creator-driven campaigns is worth reviewing as a practical illustration of how audience expansion can be structured through channel and format choices made during the broad phase.

How Narrowing Should Work Once the Broad Phase Is Complete

Once you have a genuinely wide view of the market, the narrowing process becomes more rigorous because it is based on comparison rather than assumption. You are not choosing your target segment because it is the one you know best. You are choosing it because, having looked at the full landscape, it is the one that offers the best combination of size, accessibility, competitive whitespace, and fit with your actual capabilities.

That distinction matters. Strategies built on “we know this segment well” tend to reinforce existing positions rather than build new ones. Strategies built on “we have assessed the full landscape and this is where the opportunity is” are more likely to find genuine growth.

The narrowing phase is also where you make explicit choices about what you are not going to do. This is harder than it sounds. Every segment you exclude is a potential customer you are walking away from. Every channel you deprioritise is a potential reach mechanism you are leaving on the table. But a strategy that tries to do everything is not a strategy. It is a list of activities. The discipline of narrowing is what turns a broad market understanding into a focused commercial plan.

BCG’s analysis of go-to-market strategy in financial services illustrates this well: the most effective strategies were not the ones that tried to serve the broadest possible population, but the ones that used a wide market analysis to identify specific segments where the business had a genuine right to win, and then focused resource accordingly.

The broad phase earns you the right to narrow with confidence. Without it, you are not making a strategic choice. You are making a default.

Applying This to Real Planning Cycles

In practice, the broad-to-narrow sequence does not require a months-long discovery process. It requires a structured approach to the questions you ask at the start of a planning cycle, and a genuine commitment to letting the answers influence the outcome.

In the agencies I ran, the planning cycles that produced the best work were the ones where we were disciplined about not touching channel or format decisions until we had a clear, evidence-based view of the market opportunity, the audience, and the competitive context. That discipline was sometimes uncomfortable. Clients wanted to see media plans. They did not always want to sit through a market analysis. But the plans that came out of a proper broad phase were more coherent, more defensible, and more effective.

The planning cycles that went wrong were almost always the ones where we had been pushed to narrow too early, where the brief had arrived with too many pre-formed assumptions baked in, or where the timeline did not allow for the broad phase to be done properly. The output might look like a strategy. But it was usually a set of tactics dressed up as one.

For teams working on go-to-market planning across growth stages, the growth strategy resources at The Marketing Juice cover how to structure these planning cycles in a way that maintains the broad-to-narrow discipline without turning every planning process into a six-month exercise.

The broad-to-narrow sequence is not a process quirk. It is the structural reason why some strategies hold up under pressure and others collapse the moment they meet the market. Get the sequence right, and the choices that follow become cleaner, more defensible, and more commercially grounded.

About the Author

Keith Lacy is a marketing strategist and former agency CEO with 20+ years of experience across agency leadership, performance marketing, and commercial strategy. He writes The Marketing Juice to cut through the noise and share what works.

Frequently Asked Questions